Latest Verdicts
PCG/4821/DG — The People v. My Flatmate — GUILTY of Phantom Milk | PCG/4822/DG — The People v. Karen from HR — GUILTY of Reply-All Negligence | PCG/4823/DG — The People v. The Auto Driver — GUILTY of Navigational Fraud | PCG/4824/DG — The People v. The Zomato Delivery Guy — GUILTY of Premature Delivery Declaration | PCG/4825/DG — The People v. My Colleague Rohan — GUILTY of Intellectual Appropriation | PCG/4826/DG — The People v. The Upstairs Neighbour — PARTIALLY GUILTY of Acoustic Aggression | PCG/4827/DG — The People v. My Manager — GUILTY of Epistolary Condescension | PCG/4828/DG — The People v. The Barista — NOT GUILTY: Name Negligence     PCG/4821/DG — The People v. My Flatmate — GUILTY of Phantom Milk | PCG/4822/DG — The People v. Karen from HR — GUILTY of Reply-All Negligence | PCG/4823/DG — The People v. The Auto Driver — GUILTY of Navigational Fraud | PCG/4824/DG — The People v. The Zomato Delivery Guy — GUILTY of Premature Delivery Declaration | PCG/4825/DG — The People v. My Colleague Rohan — GUILTY of Intellectual Appropriation | PCG/4826/DG — The People v. The Upstairs Neighbour — PARTIALLY GUILTY of Acoustic Aggression | PCG/4827/DG — The People v. My Manager — GUILTY of Epistolary Condescension | PCG/4828/DG — The People v. The Barista — NOT GUILTY: Name Negligence
Est. 2024, Division III

About the Court

The Honourable Petty Court of Daily Grievances is the world's foremost judicial body dedicated exclusively to complaints that are, by any objective measure, completely trivial.

Our Mission

For too long, the aggrieved citizens of this world have suffered in silence. The flatmate who finishes the milk. The colleague who steals your idea. The person who replies-all. These injustices go unaddressed. Courts are too busy. Therapists are too expensive. Group chats are too chaotic.

The Petty Court exists to fill this void. We provide formal, legally-worded, entirely non-binding verdicts on matters that no real court would touch. We take your grievances seriously. Extremely seriously. With a straight face and everything.

Our Jurisdiction

The Petty Court of Daily Grievances holds jurisdiction over all matters classified under Division III: Minor Grievances and Petty Offences. This includes but is not limited to:

— Milk-related domestic disputes

— Inbox contamination via Reply-All

— Navigational misrepresentation by auto drivers

— Unsolicited life advice from relatives

— Any grievance involving a flatmate, colleague, or delivery partner

— The playing of music too loud, too early, or too enthusiastically

Matters of genuine legal consequence are beyond our purview. We refer those to actual courts, therapists, or the group chat.

The Bench

The Court is presided over by Hon. Justice P.R. Iyengar, whose decades on the bench have given him an unparalleled ability to write extremely formal sentences about extremely silly situations.

Appeals are heard by Hon. Chief Justice S. Krishnamurthy of the Court of Appeal, Petty Division, who has never in his career overturned a verdict without issuing a longer, more elaborate one in its place.

Both judges are, to be clear, AI. Very dignified AI. With very good handwriting (see their signatures on the notices).

Are the Verdicts Real?

No. Absolutely not. The verdicts issued by this Court are generated by artificial intelligence and carry no legal weight whatsoever. They cannot be used in court. They cannot be cited as precedent. They will not hold up at Diwali dinner.

They will, however, be extremely satisfying to forward to the person who wronged you.

Why Does This Exist?

Because some grievances are too petty for a serious conversation but too real to just let go. Because sometimes you need the universe to formally acknowledge that yes, what they did was wrong. Because a court notice with a stamp that says GUILTY is infinitely more cathartic than a passive-aggressive text.

Also, it's funny. The Court believes strongly in the therapeutic value of laughing at your own complaints.

File a Complaint